Before I explain my understanding, I will first discuss the topic of “clarifying concepts”.
Every noun, the so-called concept, refers to something or phenomenon. Because the focus of understanding the term is different, it causes everyone's understanding of the same noun to be more or less different. This is unavoidable. Everyone can only describe the thing itself as close as possible through words, but the words described can never replace the things themselves.
The stock that I understand has the following characteristics:
1. It is a kind of securities (that is, when you own this securities, you can find the corresponding price if you want to calculate its value)
2. It represents a right (this includes: the company's voting rights and the right to obtain dividends from the company's profits. If you own a stock, you will have one or both of these rights.)
3. It represents an obligation (the obligation to develop with the company and assume the risks that the company may face)
Think about it, how do you or the people around you think about the concept of "stock".
When someone says something like "stock is the kind of buy, wait until the price rises and sells, earn profits", what kind of risk does this imply?
More articles, please see "English version index"
Philosophical thinking of financial transactions
2018年8月7日星期二
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)
4.0 Observing Object Conversion - Observing Self (1)
As of now, the articles focus on the things outside the trader's own: concepts, propositions, strategies, and so on. These contents are ...
-
Try to take a few minutes and think about the first concept that was faced in the historical interval of A: stock. Then think about: Is ...
-
很多交易者在制定策略后,很少去进行详尽的历史检验。虽然历史发生的事实无法验证策略在将来使用的准确性,但一个策略制定后,如果在历史已经发生的事实中都无法检验,那么这个策略的出发点极有可能也存在着重大问题。 对于制定好交易策略的交易者来说,其交易策略要么偏向于使用基本面分析,要么...
没有评论:
发表评论